Ain't It Cool News (www.aintitcool.com)
Movie News

A Ton Of PLANET OF THE APES Reviews!!!

Hey folks, Harry here... and the reviews for PLANET OF THE APES seem to be all over the place... from happy, to blase, to disappointment. Personally, I can't imagine ever hating a Rick Baker Ape movie... Hell, I downright love SCHLOCK: THE BANANA MONSTER.... And I'm sure Tim Burton does too... hehehe... But here we go, the first three reviews are spoiler free and safe... 2 positives and 1 negative, after that... they begin spoiling some stuff... so if ya wanna stay pure, stick to the first three and avoid the Talk Backs... if you don't care, read em all.... Here ya go....

I liked POTA because it lived up to my expectations which could be summed up like this:

Do apes look real? Yes! Amazing makeup work! I had only a little problem with Helena Bonham Carter because she looked like going ape for multiple face-lifts. Think apelicious La Toya Jackson. Apes also move in specific way.

Is Planet of the Apes their planet enough? Yup. Ape characters are more developed than human ones. We see ape culture and that different ape groups have different take on humans. There are good guys and there are bad guys. Plus apes are fierce warriors. Mark Wahlberg`s arrival sets events in motion but that`s all his character is about. Apes have much more substance (which is OK for movie named POTA).

Is there some serious ass-kicking? Yes. Battle scenes are amazing and there`s butt-kicking babe as well.

Is the blond kick-ass angel one of the hottest action heroines of the year? Oh, yeah! I love to see gorgeous babe in every movie but gorgeous ass-kicker is perfection. And POTA`s Estelle Warren struts her out-of-this-world stuff while fighting, horse-riding, diving,etc. Those lips...that face...athletic bod...blond hair that looks like the sun and wind live there...She`s perfect beauty for any beast movie.

Popcorn entertainment? Yes. I didn`t expect more than that so I enjoyed it for what it was - popcorn flick which wowed me with its amazing apes, effects, action scenes, impossibly beautiful blonde. It entertained me which is something I appreciate more than sitting through a masterpiece/movie classic that makes me yawn.

All the best,

Vintop

Now we have the Moor Of Venice

The Moor of Venice here. I am not under the vile influence of that wretched dog Iago when I say this, "Planet of the Apes" is a dud.

I'll keep this to the point and avoid spoilers.

Tim Burton's reimagination is largely pointless. If by reimagined you mean stripped down of any meaning or resonance, then he's dead on. His spin on "Apes" is little more than a gloriusly filmed chase flick. Wahlberg's character is a snooze inducing presence with little in the way of heroic attributes. He's a survivor, not a legend or even a personality. The situation the film gives him to become heroic feels forced and just generaly pulled out of thin air. All the humans in this film are forgettable. The humans of Burton's ape planet have the ability to speak, they simply have nothing to say. But what about why we're here to begin with, the apes?

Tim Roth is all fury and menace as Thaid. A perpetually pissed off chimp who sneers at everything and everyone, motivation be damned. He holds the film up on his shoulders for some time, but his one-dimensional nature becomes apparent after an hour or so. Most of the other ape characters, Carter, Clark, Giamatti, etc., are fairly well developed and played with a lot of passion. Nobodies slacking off here. And the total emmersion into a fully developed ape society keeps us at full attention. The set design is Oscar worthly and the make up is a shoe-in. What ultimately wrecks this film is its plot. As in its sorely lacking one.

Burton is a master of hiding his paper thin stories behind an array of elaborate visuals. He's a great screen magician that way. But this time the defeciencies in story can't be hidden. Wahlberg crashes, gets captured, gets chased, insert terrible ending. There are other plot points being lobbed about but much like Burton's Batman Returns, he knows not what to do with any of them. And yes, this movie's ending is terrible. I'm not just referenceing the big 'twist.' The entire third act is a washout. Nothing but a forced resolution and circumstanial plotting. Then there's that twist. To say it makes no sense is an understatement. The film rushes headlong into it, as if it just can't wait to unleash this corkscrew. But when it happens, it's a meaningless act. It serves no purpose to the plot at all, it's merely an arbitrary event there to pay homage to the original film. It's an obligation it feels it has to pay.

P.S. A friend of mine, a big Apes fan, provided a very fitting explanation to this lousy ending, but remember movie law #1, if you didn't see it, it didn't happen. Keep that in mind when watching. The movie ask us to make a big and unexplained leap. Leaping in fact, all the way back to the original films for a point of reference to make sense out of this. This is impossible to talk about without ruining things for everyone else. I'll shut up.

And now for Mr Simian...

Yo Harry! Since you seem to have had a dearth of early reviews of Tim Burton’s Planet of the Apes remake, I thought I’d chime in with a quick piece of opinionated simian insight regarding the (just finished in the nick of time) final print of the film I saw today.

The bottom line? Certainly not Burton’s best, but a damn fine ride nonetheless. While the plot often strains the bounds of credulity (and, at times, even comprehension), the overall flow and construction of the film is excellent, with the framing and execution of the big fight sequences, in particular, providing a more satisfying kick than any other action film in recent memory. And yes, Charlton Heston does appear (in a scene that involves a pistol, and even has him wheezing "Damn them! Damn them to hell!"). Even more impressively, Burton manages to work in a variation on the classic "Get your stinking paws off me…" line that is both non-intrusive and pretty damn funny.

The best part of this Planet, however — as you might well imagine — is the perfectly cast crew of chimps, gorillas and damn dirty apes who keep messing with Marky Mark’s meager little mind. From Rick Baker’s stunningly naturalistic makeup to the seamless (and sparingly employed) wire work, these are primates that seem absolutely real from the first second they appear, and the illusion is never broken. In fact, the best parts of the movie often involve secondary characters that appear on screen for only a moment, doing things that every evolved species has surely done since the dawn of time (a particularly priceless sequence involves Wahlberg and his rag-tag band of humans escaping from the city, running past a group of young chimps as they pass a bong around, through an older ape’s house as he removes his toupee and false teeth, etc.).

And, despite the heavy prosthetics, each of the main primate characters manages to come across as an expressive, sharply defined individual (much more so than the human leads, actually). Tim Roth makes a fine, lithe-but-imposing villain — all snarling attitude and explosive, gravity-defying power (his room-trashing freakout scene is particularly impressive). On the comedic front, Paul Giamatti is exactly right as the obsequious, snaggle-toothed slave trader Limbo — he does everything that Lucas tried and failed to do with that annoying, vaguely offensive Watto character from Episode 1. And Helena Bonham Carter… well, what can I say? I’ve never really understood the whole "furries" thing (much less visited alt.binaries.erotica.monkeylove — I swear), but man is she cute in that chimp outfit.

In all seriousness, though, I think that all of the ape actors (and, by extension, Tim Burton) should be commended for their nuanced portrayals. Unlike the original POTA, these characters are obviously, frighteningly primal — even the "good" characters often screech and squeal when you least expect it, and their movements are a sublime blend of recognizable human actions and loping, coiled simian fury.

Unfortunately, the human actors don’t fare nearly as well. Wahlberg makes a serviceable action hero, but he doesn’t have anywhere near Heston’s heroic presence (his big "we’ve got to band together and fight" speech comes off like a whiny high-school quarterback’s pep talk). Kris Kristofferson, meanwhile, is completely wasted (he might as well have had "sacrificial lamb" tattooed on his forehead), while Estella Warren, as hot as she is, is given nothing to do and is completely unconvincing while doing it (her character suffers a major loss halfway through the movie, and two scenes later she’s making moon-eyes at Marky as if nothing had happened). And so, to recap (in the inimitable style of Phil Hartman’s Frankenstein, god rest his soul): Apes good! Humans baaaad!

In general, though, Burton’s Apes is great fun, and the plot certainly offers enough amusing twists and turns to keep most popcorn movie enthusiasts happy (even the ludicrous "twist ending" — which makes absolutely no sense from a logical standpoint — is so hilariously over the top that you can’t help but smile). Not a great film by any stretch of the imagination — but in this summer of huge disappointments like A.I. and hackneyed crap like Tomb Raider, we should all get on our knees and thank tiny Tim for this entertaining (if slightly apeshit) effort.

Now for the R-Man

Harry,

Hey man, I just got back in from the screening of Planet of the Apes here in LA.

What a dissapointment. Although the make up is nice, and Paul Giamati (sp) who played Pig Vomit in "Private Parts", provides some comic relief.. parts of it play like a B-movie.

I'll let someone else ruin the ending (if it hasn't already been done here) but the "surprise ending" is bullshit. Absolute bullshit. It makes no sense. It comes out of nowhere and left the entire audience in absolute confusion. I don't think anyone understood it. I lover science fiction and can appreciate it.... but this was crap. This nutty ending turned an alright movie into a joke. Unless they were trying to make it like a twilight zone episode, it doesn't work and will be hated by audiences across the country/world. UGH!!!! I should've stayed home.

oh well, at least it was free. For the rest of you, save your money or see a twilight show, this is not worth $8 or $9.50.

Hey! Paul Giamati is on the Daily Show right now.

R-man

now for a very unhappy review...

Now that the Westwood, California press screening of Planet of the Apes is over and done with, I'm sure you're getting deluged with reviews. So I'll keep mine short and not get into the details of the story.

This is by far the worst film Tim Burton has ever done. Oliver Stone would have given this the wicked evilness it needed, and I'm not a huge Oliver Stone fan.

Let's go down the list one-by-one.

Mark Walhberg: He's bland. He's surprised me with greatness so many times, that I was finally willing to admit that this punk rapper turned underwear model was a terrific actor. Alas, in "Apes" he just drifts through with no vitality.

The Other Actors: Tim Roth eats his character for dinner. He was the only actor who even tried to inject some life into his character. Helena Bonham Carter's makeup was not as ape-ish, so as to make her more sympathetic, and she did a terrific job. One odd thing was that a lot of the actor spoke with a slight lisp, which was probably because of the prosthetic teeth. That was occassionally annoying.

The Sets: I'm friggin' sorry, but whoever spent $100 million on those sets needs to have their head examined. They look so damn "soundstage."

And I hate it when stories take place at night, so they can hide how cheap the sets really look. There was not one scene in Ape City that took place during the day. The sets were just not good.

The Makeup: Terrific. How can it not be. But considering how far computer graphics have come since 1968 (From zero to "Final Fantasy"), the makeup effects in Apes have not advanced as dramatically. Are they great: sure. Can they start etching the name Rick Baker on the Best

MakeUp Oscar: sure. But it's not time to blow your brains out over it. I did like how some of the apes ran quickly on all fours.

Story and Dialogue: The dialogue is horrendous. There are some nods to lines from the original movie, but we rolled our eyes more than we appreciated the cinematic tip of the hat. These guys are no Rod Serling.

The story is actually kinda boring. There's a decent twist about 2/3 through. And there's a big ape versus human melee that was a long time coming. But it starts to get more and more ridiculous as it lumbers towards it's merciful conclusion, especially when one of the characters from the beginning is re-introduced towards the end.

Surprise Ending: Made no sense. Surprise ending for the sake of a surprise ending. People at the screening were questioning it big time. I read the Drudge headline and it seemed vague since I wasn't sure how it fit into the end and I refused to read the accompanying story. Now I know...and Drudge is a dick. It reminds me of that unforgettable morning in 1980-something when CBS-TV film reviewer Pat Collins was reviewing "Return of the Jedi." For some reason, I cared what she thought of the movie, so I stared dumbfounded when she said, "and is Darth Vader Luke's father? YES! And does Yoda die? YES!" I lunged at the TV (no remote control on my TV in 1980-something!), but it was too late. The film was ruined. What was that bitch thinking? The same thing Drudge was thinking...nothing. "I wanna be first so I can be cool."

In 1968, they made Planet of the Apes because it was a great political allegory with great makeup and a killer shock ending. In 2001, they make Planet of the Apes because the stockholders need to be satisfied. When the film ended, I thought it was barely adequate. But the more I thought about it, the more I disliked it.

And lastly, here's one more non-spoiler review....

I don't know if this is the right place to send a review of a movie or not, because this is my first time sending anything to your site, and my first movie review. I am a huge fan of your website and recommend it to everyone. Anyway, here's my view on the movie. No spoilers either!

I'll make this quick. I got some free passes to go see Planet of the Apes and so me and my wife went to go see it. First off, this movie is so predictable it is shameful. Fans of the original have nothing to fear. This movie does no justice to the legend of the original. This movie will fade from our memories very quickly. This is the best that Tim Burton can do? Boy are we in trouble. The movie doesn't seem it can decide if it's going to be serious or light hearted. The movie starts out serious but it flip flops throughout between serious and down right silly. You see trademark Tim Burton humor that is strange to say the least. At the same time the movie is a site to behold. The scenery and overall look of the movie is fantastic. The costumes are everything you would expect of a Tim Burton film.

But here's the problem with the movie. There is TOO MUCH SILLINESS in this movie. The Apes are shown both frightening and as clowns in the same scenes. It seems as though, sure the apes are in charge, but it's like they are in charge ONLY because the humans haven't been able to get their act together and take over. The writing of this movie is pitiful. One major element of how this movie differs from the original is that there are more holes in this movies plot than a slice of Swiss cheese. I can name at least 4 major plot holes in this film, but I won't because it will spoil the movie. The acting is good, if not a little hokey. The best acting was done by everyone in costume. Charlton Heston's scene (only one!) was not remarkable or worth remembering. Mark Wahlberg, needs help. Was much better in the Corrupter. The fight scenes were well done. The cinematography was great as well.

I don't know what else to say about this movie. The great ending that Tim Burton mentioned? It must be in another movie he saw or a new movie he has planned because it wasn't in this movie. The ending was so predictable, Stevie Wonder could see it coming. For anyone who cares, there was no love scene between man and ape. It's a good thing too, because that would have been another reason in a long list of reasons why I would not pay to see this movie.

Would I recommend this movie? No. There are a lot of other movies worth seeing.

Readers Talkback
comments powered by Disqus