Hey Folks, Harry here... I know, I know... I should rename the site, AINT IT KONG NEWS - don't think I haven't thought of it. I love the story of KING KONG. Not only is KING KONG my favorite film, but it's responsible for my love of various "primitive" cultures. You walk into my house - and what you're first struck by isn't film memoribilia, but masks (from cultures around the world), Zulu spears, Amazonian Arrows, a dagger from Borneo... then you turn and begin to see the obvious influence of film - THE HOUND OF THE BASKERVILLES, REBEL WITHOUT A CAUSE and the FRANKENSTEIN MEETS THE WOLFMAN posters... and only if you notice the reflection on the far wall of the dining room do you see evidence of my original KONG poster. This morning - bright and early I got sent the following press release from NEWSWEEK that they had Devin Gordon's story and account of having seen the mostly complete version of KING KONG. If you go to their site, linked at the bottom of the below article, you'll read a far more complete account - and if you click on the "AUDIO CLIP" offered under the "NEWSWEEK ON THE AIR" you'll hear the two rather stuffy sounding hosts of their PODSHOW interviewing Devin Gordon who is just enthusing about his take on KING KONG. Tomorrow - KING KONG will be finished, the prints will begin to all be struck for the world-wide release, and Peter Jackson and "family" will be boarding planes for a nearly 20 hour flight to NEW YORK - to begin the hellacious press junketeering and premiere. If you want to know how Peter is going to watch the premiere of his film... He wrote me this weekend. He's going to sit with the original KING KONG armature in his lap, the 18" one that Bob Burns has. That should tell you a bit about Peter, and just how much love went into this.
JACKSON WANTED SENSE THAT KONG IS 'GRIZZLED AND SCARRED BECAUSE IT TELLS A STORY OF BEING ALONE,' SAYS SCREENWRITER BOYENS
New York-Director Peter Jackson's $207 million remake of "King Kong" is three hours long, a difference from the 1933 original, which was 100 minutes. "A few people have already asked me why we're taking twice as long to tell essentially the same story," Jackson tells Newsweek. "And I don't really know. We've been asking that ourselves. I'm going to have to come up with a better answer."
Senior Writer Devin Gordon, who got an exclusive first look at the film when he accepted Jackson's invitation and flew halfway around the world to see it, writes that perhaps the best answer is the movie itself. "If the 44-year-old Kiwi felt any pressure over following up 'The Lord of the Rings,' you won't find a hint of it on screen," Gordon writes in the December 5 issue of Newsweek (on newsstands Monday, November 28). "Some critics will complain that the film's length is an act of Oscar-drunk hubris, but while 'Kong' may be indulgent, it's not pretentious. And it's certainly never dull. Jackson has honored his favorite film in the best possible way: by recapturing its heart-pounding, escapist glee."
Gordon writes that one of the major differences in the remake is Kong. Jackson's ape is pushing 50 years old, his jaw is offset and his right eyebrow droops from long-ago scrapes with dinosaurs. His fur is matted and mucky, with bald patches here and there from the scar tissue. "Peter really wanted a sense that Kong is old and grizzled and scarred," says Philippa Boyens, Jackson's screenwriter, "because it tells a story of being alone. And of having to survive in the most dangerous place on earth."
Kong's existence is pure brutality-until Ann Darrow (Naomi Watts, in the role made iconic by Fay Wray) comes along. "She sparks his curiosity," Jackson says. "It's the first time he's ever empathized with another living creature." Ann, thinking the rest of her shipmates are dead, comes to depend on Kong for protection. Their relationship is poignantly drawn-although after Kong is dragged to New York City in chains, there's a scene on a frozen pond in Central Park that tilts toward the corny. Gordon writes that it must have made Jackson impatient too. He ends it abruptly with a giddy blast of artillery fire.
Another difference from the original is Ann Darrow's love interest, Jack Driscoll (Adrien Brody) was the ship's first mate in the 1933 version; this time around, he is filmmaker Carl Dehnam's (Jack Black) screenwriter.
# # # (Read article at www.Newsweek.com
