Ain't It Cool News (www.aintitcool.com)
Movie News

AICN DOWNUNDER #100 -

AICN-DOWNUNDER

Here I am at AICN-D number #100. It's a bit of a hollow celebration, given there were plenty of AICN-Ds before I started, and given the number probably isn't 100 anyway if you include top ten lists and film festival reports and the like, but damn it, it's a big round number and I'm going to celebrate.

I didn't actually have any celebrations planned. I just thought people might like to send me money.

If, however, you feel I don't deserve money for this tripe, please scroll down to have your opinions confirmed by a lacklustre news section followed by a review that's sure to piss everybody off.

Enjoy!

NEWS

Kiwi actors Emily Barclay (IN MY FATHER'S DEN) heads to New South Wales to join Michael Dorman in SUBURBAN MAYHEM. Directed by Paul Goldman (AUSTRALIAN RULES, THE NIGHT WE CALLED IT A DAY) and written by Alice Bell (SUBURBAN MAYHEM), the film follows a nineteen year old girl accused of killing her father. The film will lens in Sydney and Newcastle, and will hopefully out-gross FANTASTIC FOUR 2.

VOODOO LAGOON, a film I'm certain I've reported on fairly recently but can't be bothered searching the archives for, has begun production up north on the Gold Coast. The film is a co-production between Australia and the UK, and will feature characters, story and conflict.

Reader JRS has written in to let us know about the closure of the Valhalla cinema in Sydney. Apparently this has taken place a week before the closure of another arthouse cinema, the Chauvel. The importance? "That leaves less than the number of fingers one hand to watch art-house or indie films in Sydney city, without having to travel to fox studios. (or opera house, no parking) Sad day indeed for the aspiring filmmakers and the indie market/crowd. What is Australia doing with the industry?" Don't worry, JRS! I'm sure when DUKES OF HAZZARD comes out, there'll be plenty of mainstream cinemas playing it! Thanks for your letter!

AWARDS AND FESTIVALS

AUSTRALIAN SCREEN DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION

The ASDA will be holding its annual conference this September at the Sydney College of the Arts. The conference, entitled "Creating Freedom: Dreaming, Planning and Realising the Low Budget Film" will feature guest keynote speaker Joel Schumacher. As much as I'd love to make a Schumacher joke (I don't care how out-of-fashion they are, I still get a kick out of them), he's actually a pretty good choice. If there's anyone who knows how to get a film made when all hope is lost, I'm sure Joel is the man.

TORONTO INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL

Adding an impressive *nine* world premiers to its iPod playing list, TIFF has managed to secure THE WORLD'S FASTEST INDIAN, helmed by Southern Hemispherarian Roger Donaldson.

44TH MELBOURNE INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL

A few of the winners from MIFF's Short Film Competition included Iran's SILENT COMPANION (Grand Prix for Best Short Film), the Iranian/Swedish PROSTITUTION BEHIND THE VEIL (Best Documentary Short), Chris Cunningham's RUBBER JOHNNY (Best Experimental Short) and Australia's IN MY DAY (Best Animated Short). Hope we'll see some of those come Oscar time.

14TH BRISBANE INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL

BIFF also wrapped up, announcing the three winners of the Jury Awards last Saturday. The film critic's award for the best Asia Pacific Film went to LOOK BOTH WAYS from Sarah Watt. The 2005 Interfaith Award for a film promoting humanitarian values went to Gregg Araki's no-longer-in-danger-of-being-banned MYSTERIOUS SKIN. The Netpac Award for the Promotion of Asian Cinema was awarded to SPYING CAM, a South Korean psychological thriller from Whang Cheol-mean.

RELEASED THIS WEEK

Adrian Brody finds some gulfing attire, Will Ferrell models his life on that English guy who spent a year saying "yes" to everything, Stephen Chow makes THE MATRIX for film critics, a Culkin gets revenge on someone twice his size... with hilarious results!, Danny Boyle's agent comes up with an interesting pay day negotiating tactic, and someone thinks of a new suffix for the word "wedding".

THE JACKET

KICKING AND SCREAMING

KUNG FU HUSTLE

MEAN CREEK

MILLIONS

WEDDING CRASHERS

BOX OFFICE

Doing pretty good business in its second week (phenomenal business, compared to its US opening) is Michael Bay's suddenly-litigious cloney island film. Nice work getting Romero to third spot, by the way.

1. THE ISLAND

2. MONSTER-IN-LAW

3. LAND OF THE DEAD

4. FANTASTIC FOUR

5. SIN CITY

REVIEWS

WEDDING CRASHERS

(massive spoilers)

I'm a fan of ANCHORMAN and DODGEBALL and ZOOLANDER. Generally speaking, I dig the output of the Stiller-Vaughn-Wilson-Wilson-Ferrell troupe, and will see most everything they collectively do. Last Monday I skipped work to see a media screening WEDDING CRASHERS, which I'd been hanging out for. After all, Wilson and Vaughn are, in my opinion, the most charismatic of the two, and seeing them paired together was impossible to resist.

I came out thinking the film wasn't really that good. It has its funny moments and its roll-your-eyes-how-did-they-put-that-in? moments, but as vaguely enjoyable as it was, there wasn't a lot of chemistry. Owen Wilson and Vince Vaughn didn't have the chemistry that either one of them shares with Stiller, but both are very funny when featured alone. There were also some big wastes: the boyfriend that Wilson's trying to win The Girl away from is too much of a Convenient Arsehole, even by Hollywood standards, and Christopher Walken was pretty much wasted.

I came out thinking the film was a bit nothing. Then I thought a bit more about some of the reactions I'd had at key moments in the film, and realised that the entire film is actually about something else, and, on that level, it's quite brilliant.

Let me explain.

The movie cliché that I loathe above most others is the one where the guy professes his love to the girl. The girl, who previously thought the guy was a freak/had slept with her sister/had outright lied to her with every breath he had, does a sudden 180 and thinks, "Wow, he must really like me! I guess I'll disregard my personal feelings for him and allow him to plant the crowd-pleasing kiss on my smacker," then does so, usually to applause from her family and friends who are silently watching from the stands. Anyone who has had interaction with the opposite sex (or the exactly-the-same sex, if you bend that way) knows that it doesn't work like that. That person, even if they liked you, will turn and head for the hills if they sense desperation or unmatched affection. We've seen it in our own lives and the lives of those around us.

WEDDING CRASHERS contains such a scene. Owen Wilson's character (who has completely lied to Rachel McEvan's character - there's been no misunderstanding, he really is a cad) professes his love, and all is suddenly well. I was thinking that we'd moved passed this cliché. I didn't think a film like this would take two steps backwards and use the tired old scene that had peaked somewhere in the late 90s.

When the scene came up on screen, I started to ponder the actual nature of Claire Cleary (McAdams). If her own feelings and attractions and morals and standards are so irrelevant, even to her, then how can she exist? If she makes decisions based on what John (Wilson) and we (the audience) want - and in this case, we are one and the same - then she is not a separate character, but merely a part of John. His superego. John reacts almost completely on his id, and in the final scenes he is forced to act as ego to counter the two. Claire is non-existent. She is not a character in this film.

Gloria (Isla Fisher) *is* a character. She certainly has her own opinions and feelings and goals that Jeremy (Vince Vaughn) is forced to deal with and react to. She certainly does exist, and the love story between them - improbably as it is - is far more important than the one between Claire and John. Why?

This is more than just a buddy film. This is a film about Jeremy and John being in love with one another.

Look, I roll my eyes as well when critics try to read homosexual themes into, I don't know, TOY STORY or whatever. I don't think Dorothy's red slippers represent her first period, I just think that the studio thought red would look better in technicolour than the grey that L. Frank Baum had written in the book. I didn't go searching for these themes in WEDDING CRASHERS - they jumped out at me. I couldn't avoid them.

Wilson and Vaughn are in love with one another (I'll stop using their character names - having seen the film less than a week ago, I still needed IMDb to get their monikers). They express this love by finding girls together, sleeping with them simultaneously, and talking about it afterwards. The bottle they share at that ubiquitous Washington site is the post-coital cigarette.

Wilson isn't happy, though. He wants more and isn't sure how to get it. He goes for generic, raven-haired beauty at one of the weddings. She's not any more beautiful than the other girls we see him sleep with, but we're assured that this one is special because she laughs at the vows the couple on the altar share.

He and Vaughn do their thing, lie about everything in their lives, and, when found out, are booted out by the family. The exodus comes after some encounters with the younger brother of the family, Todd, who basically represents Vaughn's fear and self-loathing. It's Todd's advances that ultimately serve as the catalyst for Vaughn going over to the "dark side", the monogamous heterosexual relationship he'd always despised and mocked.

Kicked out of the Cleary house and spurned by McAdams, Wilson maintains he's in love with her, but really it's not that bad. He's able to continue his life without too much trouble. He pines, but everything carries on as normal; his life is not thrown into tumult. What *really* screws him up is when he finds out that Vaughn has been continuing to see Isla Fisher in secret. At that point, Wilson's life falls apart. He's a wreck.

He then does what many scorned lovers do, and tries to find a replacement. Who does he find? Will Ferrell. This casting is significant, and it's revealed to us in what the filmmakers hope is the most suspenseful way possible, because we know exactly who he is. We know Ferrell. We know the films he's done with Wilson, with Vaughn, with Stiller. He's one of the guys. This could easily have been a buddy comedy between Wilson and Ferrell. Wilson goes to him to ease the pain of Vaughn's betrayal, and tries to create something similar with Will.

Of course, it doesn't work out, and that's when Wilson essentially crashes the wedding of Vaughn and Fisher, and gives that big speech to McAdams. The speech isn't that good and shouldn't really excuse him, but she kisses him and everyone applauds. What really happens in the scene (and again I say that if the scene was really a reconciliation between Wilson and McAdams, then their reunion would carry more weight or be, at least, more believable) is Wilson making his peace with Vaughn. Asking for him back. Making a compromise. At first, I thought that compromise is the realisation that if they hook up with these sisters, then they can be together forever. Then I realised that if McAdams doesn't really exist, then the compromise is Wilson agreeing to tag along and tolerate Vaughn's fake relationship with Fisher.

A successful public declarations of love is not real. Compromise is. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is what the film is really about.

NEXT WEEK

- Warner Bros. purchases WOLF CREEK remake rights to use as the structure for DUKES OF HAZZARD 2

- Eddie Murphy goes to the premiere of Werner Herzog's GRIZZLY MAN and the next day pitches an idea for DR DOLITTLE 3

- Steven Spielberg begins production on a fourth INDIANA JONES movie

Peace out,

Latauro

If you want to send me something in the spirit of celebrating my 100th Downunder - Click Here!

Readers Talkback
comments powered by Disqus