Hey folks, Harry here with a few more reviews from Toronto. Ya know, Takeshi Kitano and ZATOICHI picking up the Audience Award feels so good. Here's a film that from the second it was announced we geeks knew was gonna kick ass and to see it kick ass at a festival like Toronto... Well, it just feels good when things you're certain about certainly rule! NOW... Who is ready to see the Takeshi Kitano & Takeshi Miike Samurai film team-up? Hhehehehe... that's gonna rule all sorts of ass! Here's Dr. Zinjhou with the latest...
It’s Dr.Zinjhou, here you go harry, a few more TIFF reviews.
Zatoichi
Takeshi Kitano
Set in rural Japan at no specific point in time, although it hints at a more ancient period, circa 1900. The samurai is more or less a legend, a kind of tale that has vanished with time, kind of like the wild west cowboy, it’s a title, if you will. The film opens with Beat Takeshi sitting on the shoulder of a dirt road, from there one could only imagine the kind of intro we would be treated to. Zatoichi is the all knowing quiet & humble figure that has often been portrayed in films, the kind that turns to violence as a last resort. To the townspeople he is the Masseur, whom cautiously feels his way along the dirt roads of a gang ridden town. The local sake (Japanese drink) tavern is the spot where many of the characters in the film cross paths, all of the scenes that take place in the sake tavern are essential to the development of the story, in that they provide great incite, thus helping us gather knowledge of each and every character in the film, for there are quite a few. Primarily we have Zatoichi, secondary I guess we could fit in Hattori (hired ronin by one of gang lords) The two geishas (out to avenge the murder of their family) as well as Zatoichi’s gambling buddy.
The film has many things going on at one, as mentioned above, each character has it’s own mission, so to speak, they each set out to accomplish something, it simply becomes a matter of bringing these events together, essentially that is what the film does. In short, without going too much into detail, the film succeeds on a story telling level, to keep true to each of the characters calling, as opposed to mixing it all in too soon together, it is only in towards the final acts of the film that we uncover great truths about each character. Visually speaking the film is incredible, it’s just beautiful, a lack of concrete sur adds a touch of fantasy to the film. The Town in the film is beautifully designed, nothing to eccentric to the point of distraction. Inside the sake tavern we get a feel of the old western bar, kind of, with some locals. The cinematography I found to be quite formal, except during the fight scenes. Well, the fight scenes, they are outstanding, Zatoichi is as bad ass as they come in my opinion, appearances can sure be deceiving. Battle sequences in Zatoichi are quick and to the point, no beating around the bush, more like cut straight through the bush. Those blades are insanely sharp, I mean, they cut through people as a knife would through very very very soft butter.
There was one thing however that caught me off guard in the first few minutes of the film, the use of CGI. It’s not that I am against it or anything, it’s just that I didn’t expect it, however, when I saw that first spurt of blood fly out the zatoichi (victim 1 of 50 or so? Who knows) I was like whoa, that’s some crazy blood! It kind of reminded my of Blade (snipes) blood. Don’t get me wrong, when used properly, CGI I mean, it can definitely enhance the experience, and in the case of Zatoichi it did. It helped accomplish interesting decapitation shots. The film closes with what appears to be a ritual dance that escalates into a kind of tapp jazz show, in which the characters are performing along, in a theatrical fashion. I found this quite interesting, for it kind of put us in a position to question ourselves as to what we’ve just seen, indeed it was a beautifully crafted film, in that the audience were treated to an ultimate spectacle, both in terms of the stories developed, but also in the genres intertwined together, something that is very common in Japanese cinema. In all honesty Zatoichi was probably the best film that I saw at the festival this year (tough choice). Beat Takeshi pulls it off, both directing and staring in this marvellous stylish piece of work that deserves the attention of any film lover.
Elephant
Gus Van Sant
Having heard some of the buzz concerning this film it was kind of hard not to form any expectations. For one they continually covered it on Rogers TV(TIFF coverage channel) by showing interviews from Cannes with Gus Van Sant as well as a few segments of the film. From these short clips I began to visualize the style in which the film was shot, basically an upper bust shot of the person walking, panning along throughout the halls of the school, that kind of visual. This technique is often used in the film, giving a more intimate feel to each character we follow. For the film is a continuous unfolding of events from the perspective of different students. If you do not want to know what this film is about stop reading, although you really should know, for it’s not a big spoiler. We all know what is going to happen in the end, what is key in the telling of this story is how we get there. I won’t describe it, you need to see it for yourself, words simply can’t describe it, it would be kind of like writing down what you did on a specific day in high school, that times the number of students we follow, if I am correct approximately 10 students or so. Van Sant spoke about his choices of camera movement following the film, he mentioned an addiction to the Tomb Raider game, so it’s kind of like this Third person view, the camera right behind your back. Essentially we follow everyone like that, it becomes almost documentary like in it’s authenticity. Ok, so this is not a re-creation of Columbine, however, Van Sant did mention he wanted to keep it as accurate as possible.
The film builds, we identify with the characters, see a little of ourselves back in high school, the mood is set, then finally disturbed. Disturbed is not the right word, but the only one that comes to mind. As the credits began to roll I realized that my heart was pounding at an alarming rate, I had actually been sucked in, I wasn’t trying to read the film anymore, it was like being there essentially (sounds corny, but really, it totally involved me) I looked around to catch a glimpse of the faces of fellow festival goers, trying to relate all that I’ve seen, initially I hated it. After the film was over, the audience was treated to a Q&A with Van Sant as well as 4 of the actors, during that time regressed to a normal state, one that would allow me to look at this film to try and understand it. I managed to step back from the spectacle of things and realize that Gus Van Sant had created a solid masterpiece, well deserving of La palme d’or. He succeeded in crafting a solid film, one that sucks you in (lack of a better word). Like I wrote before, we all know the ending, it’s how we get to it that matters, if you succeed in introducing & developing each character as well as fitting them into the scheme of things, all while maintaining a realness to it, you’ve got Elephant.
Le temps du loup
Michael Haneke
A tale of uncertainty, faint hope and of infinite questions, that’s Haneke’s le temps du loup. A family arriving at their weekend home discover that another family has broken into the house and are living there. From that moment on the film becomes tense, questions begin to surface, the father (homeowner) gets killed by the father of the other family, the wife and two kids (homeowners) flee, venturing into the desolate country side striving to survive. I had read that this film hinted at a 9/11 sentiment, I tried to look for it, got so far as interpreting it as a sentiment of isolation and desperation. The film continuously pelted the audience with questions (spoken by the characters, mother, children etc...) Not directed at the audience, but more like why is this happening, where are you?, what, who, when how and so on. I found this to be irritating, Not only is the situation in the film tense, on top of that I became irritated. I think however that I understand what Haneke wanted to convey, essentially the sentiment of isolation (I think, it does however go beyond that.) Visually the film was pleasing, it looked good, the shots of muggy terrain, gray concrete, train tracks etc... really supported the overall theme, unfortunately this film wasn’t my bag. I’m not saying it plained sucked, it was simply a little irritating for me.
PTU
Johnnie To
This film is definitely well crafted, Johnnie To succeeds in delivering a well told story about sergeant Lo on a quest for his lost gun. It’s a pretty basic story, however it proves that keeping it simple stupid (K.I.S.S.) in fact can make a good movie. We are essentially following the night duty PTU (police tactical unit) through the streets of a neon lit Hong Kong as they help Lo in his quest. PTU works on a few different levels, it takes seriously as an action/thriller movie, which it has every right to do. It also manages to fit in a brilliant touch of comedy. It questions the integrity of law enforcement personnel, how far would someone go to cover/uncover the truth about the events that unfold in the story i.e. gang wars, murders, snitching etc... It’s a fun film that knows when to poke fun at it’s very own genres, clearly depicted in never-ending slow motion gun battles. Check it out if you have a chance!
Dr. Zinjhou
